How Often Do Sex Offenders Have Yo Register In Mississippi

Based on comments by our wonderful readers, I have edited this piece by adding an additional paragraph. Due south.

By Sandy . . . The Mississippi Legislature July 1 passed a bill that may be well-intentioned just is ill-conceived and potentially subversive.

Senate Bill 2009 stipulates:

. . . . information technology is unlawful for a person required to register equally a sex activity offender under Department 45-33-25 to do or commit any of the following actions with respect to the victim of the offense triggering the duty to register under this chapter:

          (a)  Threaten, visit, assail, molest, abuse, injure, or otherwise interfere with the victim;

          (b)  Follow the victim, including at the victim'southward workplace;

          (c)  Harass the victim;

          (d)  Contact the victim by telephone, written communication, or electronic means;

          (e)  Enter or remain nowadays at the victim's residence, school, or place of employment when the victim is present.

Certainly no victim, nor anyone else for that matter, should exist allowed to be subject to threats, assault, molestation, injury, or harassment.

Merely visit, contact, or live/be in the same location with?

This legislation lumps together deportment that are illegal and should never occur nether any circumstances with actions that are legal and, even for former victims and their abusers, can exist advisable.

This legislation is "umbrella" legislation, affecting all who habiliment the label "sex offender" without regard for individual circumstances. This legislation imposes a consequence that extends beyond the punishment phase, many for life. This legislation volition destroy families that have overcome the past, reconciled, and are living in safe and peaceful relationships today. This legislation may well testify to be unconstitutional.

In every state in the matrimony are men who are on the registry for consensual sex with an underage partner, and some of these men and their "victims" married and are raising families. Nether this law, it is now illegal for them to live together or be anywhere at the same fourth dimension until such fourth dimension every bit the wives are financially able to hire an attorney — or knowledgeable enough to endeavor legal proceedings without one — , petition the courts for the right to alive with their husbands, and be granted such permission.

This legislation ignores two of the most valuable tools in sexual offender handling and rehabilitation available today, family unit reunification therapy and restorative justice, two initiatives that, for those who cull them, hold out more promise for healing of victims and perpetrators alike than do incarceration and traditional therapy. For those unfamiliar with, or skeptical of, the power of restorative justice and family unit reunification therapy, you volition do good from reading the series, "I'grand a child rapist," at narsol.org.

The bill does include a caveat stating that if ". . . the victim or the parent, guardian or conservator of the victim, enters an order allowing contact with the victim . . ." that the court may – MAY — enter that gild if – IF — the court feels there are reasonable grounds.

But isn't this backwards? If the parties and the families involved, exist information technology a situation betwixt parent and child, between siblings, or involving other relatives, have opted for reunification, have committed to information technology, have worked hard at it, have forgiven and wish to restore the normal familial relationships, why should the approval of a court exist needed?

Indeed, many families who accept long ago forgiven, healed, recovered, and have been living together or enjoying being together in a family setting volition, due to this legislation, now be ripped autonomously unless they petition the court for permission to practice what they have been safely and successfully doing for perhaps years.

The vast, vast majority of sometime offenders will not reoffend, and unless continued past a familial relationship, are highly unlikely to seek contact with quondam victims.

Would it not take made more sense had the statute been written and so that those feeling threatened and Not wishing to accept contact with a former abuser seek a protection or distance society?

Sense and sexual offense legislation – seldom seen together.

Assist us achieve more people past Sharing or Liking this postal service.

Sandy, a NARSOL board member, is communications managing director for NARSOL, editor-in-chief of the Digest, and a writer for the Digest and the NARSOL website. Additionally, she participates in updating and managing the website and profitable with a multifariousness of organizational tasks.

How Often Do Sex Offenders Have Yo Register In Mississippi,

Source: https://narsol.org/2020/07/new-mississippi-sexual-offense-legislation-will-do-more-harm-than-good/

Posted by: fitzgeraldreld1996.blogspot.com

Share this post